| 卢卡奇自然概念的批判性伦理视阈——兼评青年卢卡奇批判资产阶级意识形态的方法论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈爱华.卢卡奇自然概念的批判性伦理视阈——兼评青年卢卡奇批判资产阶级意识形态的方法论[J].南京林业大学学报(人文社会科学版),2009,9(4):55-62. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈爱华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 东南大学哲学与科学系,江苏,南京,210096 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部人文社会科学基金项目，国家哲学社会科学创新基地项目"科技、伦理与艺术" |
| |
| 摘 要： | 青年卢卡奇对在所有修正主义著作中被奉为神明的方法论——自然科学的方法,即自然科学通过观察抽象实验等取得＂纯＂事实并找出它们的联系的方法,展开了批判性论述,揭示了自然科学的＂纯＂事实之伪;对当时盛行的实证主义和科学主义也进行了抨击;在此基础上提出了非常著名的思想——＂自然是一个社会范畴＂。这对于我们探究自然概念的社会本质、探索人与自然的伦理关系均有深刻的方法论意义。
|
| 关 键 词： | “纯”事实 自然性 历史 总体性 |
On Lukács' Critical Ethical Perspective of Concept of Nature——Also on Lukács' Methodology of Bourgeois Ideology Criticism |
| |
| CHEN Ai-hua.On Lukács'' Critical Ethical Perspective of Concept of Nature——Also on Lukács'' Methodology of Bourgeois Ideology Criticism[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition),2009,9(4):55-62. |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Ai-hua |
| |
| Institution: | CHEN Ai hua (Department of Philosophy and Science, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Young Lukacs criticized the methodology of natural science which is regarded as ＂God＂ in all revisionist works. Revisionism claims that natural science can obtain ＂pure＂ facts by observation, abstraction and experiment, and then find out the internal relationship. I,ukdcs＇ criticism of this methodology reveals that ＂pure＂ facts of natural science are pseudo. Lukdcs also attacked the prevailing positivism and scientism at that time. Based on this, he put forward a viewpoint： nature is a social category, which has profound methodological significance for the research of the social character of nature and the ethical relationship between human and nature. |
| |
| Keywords: | ＂pure＂ fact naturality history totality |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
