首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

在“维护”与“监督”之间——《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》立法目的分析
引用本文:孙莉. 在“维护”与“监督”之间——《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》立法目的分析[J]. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2007, 6(1): 44-47
作者姓名:孙莉
作者单位:苏州大学,法学院,江苏,苏州,215006
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学规划项目
摘    要:
自20世纪90年代初以来,关于程序的研究呈现出一系列变化:首先,程序不再被仅仅解释为诉讼程序,其所指与能指范围扩大。其次,程序不再被仅仅视作手段,其独立性质、地位和价值被认同和强调。最后,程序的价值不再被仅仅定位于效率、稳定和安全,而越来越与法治、民主、自由、人权、正义等价值目标相关联,且联结的关节点正在于现代程序控制权力滥用以保障人权的价值指向。前述程序研究的后两种变化特别是程序之于控权意义的强调,所导引的是一个关于程序性立法的主旨和价值指向的讨论,这一讨论将在近期行将重新修订的《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》立法目的之一的“维护”和“监督”这两个方面之间展开。

关 键 词:程序控权价值  程序性立法  行政诉讼法  维护  监督
文章编号:1671-7287(2007)01-0044-04
修稿时间:2006-10-09

Goal of the Legislation of Law of Administrative Proceedings: Upholding and Supervising
SUN Li. Goal of the Legislation of Law of Administrative Proceedings: Upholding and Supervising[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Technology(Social Science Edition), 2007, 6(1): 44-47
Authors:SUN Li
Abstract:
The study of the proceeding has undergone a series of changes since the 1990s: the proceeding does not refer only to lawsuit proceeding,but has wider connotation;the proceeding is not regarded only as a means,but also as one with independent position and value;the value of proceeding lies not only in efficiency,stability and safety,but is related more and more to values such as ruling by law,democracy,freedom,human rights,and justice,the relating point being the protection of human rights based on the abuse of proceeding controlling power.The latter change of proceeding,especially the controlling power,aims at reminding people of the goal and value orientation of the proceeding legislation,the discussion of which will focus on the upholding and supervising of the Law of Administrative Proceedings in china,which is to be revised soon.
Keywords:value of proceeding controlling  legislation of proceeding  Law of Administrative Proceedings  upholding  supervising
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号