首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

再论被告人承担客观证明责任——以我国刑法规定的持有型犯罪为例
引用本文:张斌.再论被告人承担客观证明责任——以我国刑法规定的持有型犯罪为例[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009(3).
作者姓名:张斌
作者单位:四川大学法学院,四川成都,610064
摘    要:刑法上,被告人在特定个罪中针对特定事项承担客观证明责任,宏观上体现了国家针对特定法益趋于严厉的刑事政策选择和保护,微观上通过明确特定个罪的犯罪构成要件具体得以实施,这在持有型犯罪的刑事立法中表现尤为明显.从证明角度来看,要真正体现持有犯需要的周延特定法益保护、严密刑事法网和严格刑事责任的刑事政策功能定位,只能由被告人证明持有特定物品行为并不会对特定法益造成可能的侵害结果,这是被告人在该类犯罪中要承担客观证明责任的刑法根据.被告人的客观证明责任是一种提示国家刑事政策风向的技术性装置.

关 键 词:持有型犯罪  客观证明责任  刑事政策

Review of the Objective Burden of Proof on the Prosecuted:A Case Study of Taking Illegal Possession
ZHANG Bin.Review of the Objective Burden of Proof on the Prosecuted:A Case Study of Taking Illegal Possession[J].Journal of Sichuan University(Social Science Edition),2009(3).
Authors:ZHANG Bin
Institution:Law School;Sichuan University;Chengdu;Sichuan 610064
Abstract:In Criminal Law,the fact that the prosecuted should bear an objective burden of proof concerning certain issues reflects a stricter and stricter protection of certain legal interests in our country.This policy is implemented by defining the elements of special crimes,which is especially obvious in the legislation concerning illegal possession crimes.Viewing from the angle of proof,in order to guarantee the protection of certain legal interests and implement a stricter criminal policy,the prosecuted must pro...
Keywords:Illegal Possession Crime  Objective Burden of Proof  Criminal Policy  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号