首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

义务·建构·理性--罗尔斯与康德政治伦理观之比较
引用本文:李志江.义务·建构·理性--罗尔斯与康德政治伦理观之比较[J].河北学刊,2004,24(3):62-66.
作者姓名:李志江
作者单位:复旦大学,哲学系,上海,200433
摘    要:罗尔斯深受康德的影响,他曾把自己的理论称为关于正义的一个"康德主义的解释".但是,他对来自康德的许多概念、方法和思想进行了限制或新的解释.这导致他的理论既有一副与康德相似的面孔,又有许多内在的差别.他们都主张义务论,但康德主张理性义务论,罗尔斯主张契约义务论;他们都使用建构主义方法,但康德建构的是普遍的道德原则,罗尔斯建构的是政治正义原则;两个人都有"理性"设准,但康德认合理性为一元的,罗尔斯认合理性为多元的.

关 键 词:康德  罗尔斯  义务论  建构主义  合理多元论
文章编号:1003-7071(2004)03-0062-05
修稿时间:2004年2月10日

Duty,Constructivism,Reason--A Comparative Study on Rawls and Kant
LI Zhi-jiang.Duty,Constructivism,Reason--A Comparative Study on Rawls and Kant[J].Hebei Academic Journal,2004,24(3):62-66.
Authors:LI Zhi-jiang
Abstract:Rawls' theory of justice was strongly influenced by Kant. At one time he wrote that his theory 'is highly Kantian in nature'. On the other hand, he made many amendments and restriction on concepts and ideas coming from Kant. So there were differences between the two philosophers. Kant thought that duty originates from reason, while Rawls thought that it originates from contracts. Kant argued for moral constructivism, while Rawls argued for political constructivism. Kant held the reason to be monistic, while Rawls held the reason to be plural.
Keywords:Kant  Rawls  deontology  constructivism  reasonable pluralism  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号