首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

罗素类型论研究(二)
引用本文:张安民.罗素类型论研究(二)[J].河南社会科学,2005,13(3):96-100.
作者姓名:张安民
作者单位:中国人民大学,书报资料中心编辑部,北京,100086
摘    要:类型论是罗素为解决逻辑悖论而构造的一个重要理论,它以恶性循环原则为前提,其核心思想是不把类当实体看,其总体思想是任一函项必定属于一定的类型和阶。类型论提供了一种对悖论的统一的解决办法,其排除悖论的实质是把引起悖论的表达式归于“无意义”。类型论本身并不完善,引来了争论,争论的焦点首先是可化归性公理,其次是恶性循环原则,引起争论的实质是在类的实在性问题上实在论和唯名论的对立。类型论尽管在总体上不那么令人满意,但它给逻辑和哲学都带来了重大的影响,这种影响是积极的。

关 键 词:罗素  类型论  
文章编号:1007-905X(2005)03-0096-05
修稿时间:2005年3月29日

Study on Russell's Theory of Types
Zhang Anmin.Study on Russell's Theory of Types[J].Henan Social Sciences,2005,13(3):96-100.
Authors:Zhang Anmin
Abstract:The theory of types Russell put forward to solve logical paradoxes is very important.From the premise of the vicious-circle principle, the theory argued that classes should not be seen as substance and pointed out that every function belongs to one type and one order with no exception. Such were its central thoughts. The theory of types has successfully presented a general method to solve paradoxes by virtually ascribing the expressions, which would produce paradox, to"nonsense". Nevertheless, it is imperfect and causes many controversies.This thesis has pointed out that what cause controversies mainly lies in two points: the axiom of reducibility and the vicious-circle principle. The deep reason causing controversies is the opposition between Realists and Nominalists as to the reality of classes. Though the theory of types is not so satisfactory a theory in general, it has brought great and positive influences on logic and philosophy.
Keywords:Russell  the theory of types  class  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号