从"一般民俗志"到"作为研究方式的民俗志"

近年来,在借鉴人类学反思民族志理论思潮和成果影响下,民俗学界对民俗志的书写范式进行了积极的反思和探索,以摆脱民俗学的危机。但只有刘铁梁的"标志性文化统领式民俗志"理论与实践,彰显了与民族志的区别,具有特别的学理意义。民俗学学科的特点决定了民俗志需要作适当的层次划分。在民俗复兴的今天,我们应该让"一般民俗志"和"作为研究方式的民俗志"共生共荣,使民俗知识有更好的机会和渠道与社会契合,实现民俗学的大发展。

From "Common Folklore ethnography" to "The Study Way of Folklore ethnography"

In recent years, with the reflection on ethnography styles in anthropology, the community of folklore has been making active reflection on folklore ethnography styles. But only the theory and practice of Liu Tieliang's "Representative Culture-Oriented" style indicates the difference of ethnography, which has special theoretical meaning. The character of folklore decides the division of folklore ethnography with the proper layers. Today, with the rebound of folklore, we should allow "Common Folklore ethnogra...