首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

技术抑制的法律规制——以汽车工业为主要视域
引用本文:郭德忠.技术抑制的法律规制——以汽车工业为主要视域[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2012,14(1):98-103.
作者姓名:郭德忠
作者单位:北京理工大学 法学院,北京,100081
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助项目“知识产权滥用的反垄断矫正”(10YJA820025);北京理工大学北京市与中央在京高校共建项目“新能源汽车政策与法规研究”(3230037031101)
摘    要:单边技术抑制主要表现为拒绝许可专利、不使用专利,在汽车及其他技术领域都会遇到,对其可以考虑适用强制许可,但对其追究反垄断法责任则存在较多争议。联合技术抑制主要指两家以上企业以协议或其他方式联合限制新技术的研发和应用,在美国汽车业发展史上,该问题曾经比较突出,为此,美国司法部进行了锲而不舍的反托拉斯指控。从我国目前汽车工业领域技术进展、专利布局情况看,未雨绸缪、提前研究技术抑制与反抑制相关问题以及制定知识产权反垄断法规是有必要的。

关 键 词:技术抑制  强制许可  反垄断
收稿时间:2011/9/30 0:00:00

Legal Governing on Technology Suppression:Auto Industry as Main Field of Vision
GUO Dezhong.Legal Governing on Technology Suppression:Auto Industry as Main Field of Vision[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition),2012,14(1):98-103.
Authors:GUO Dezhong
Institution:1.School of Law, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081,China
Abstract:Unilateral technology suppression that can be encountered in auto and other field mainly includes refusing to license patent and not using patent. To unilateral technology suppression, compulsory license may be appropriate, but antimonopoly responsibility is controversial. Joint technology suppression mainly means that two or more enterprises jointly restrict research, development and application of new technology by agreement or other ways. In the history of American auto, joint technology suppression was prominent so the United States Department of Justice instituted perseverant antitrust accusation. According to the development of technology and patent layout in auto industry of our country, to research problems of technology suppression and anti-suppression in advance and formulate intellectual property antimonopoly rule are necessary.
Keywords:technology suppression  compulsory license  antimonopoly
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号