|
|||||
|
|
| 墨家“推”、“效”与亚氏归谬法、演绎法的比较 | |
| 引用本文： | 许锦云. 墨家“推”、“效”与亚氏归谬法、演绎法的比较[J]. 广西师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2004, 25(4): 130-132 |
| 作者姓名： | 许锦云 |
| 作者单位： | 许锦云（中共郑州市委党校,河南,郑州,450007） |
| 摘 要： | 通过对墨家和亚氏所讨论的重要推理类型"推"与归谬法、"效"与演绎法的比较显明,二者既有同又有异,体现了古代中西方逻辑的相同本质和不同特点及其对后世思维偏向的影响."推"与归谬法之同在于都设定了对矛盾律的运用,都能由此推出谬论;它们之异体现在理论深度、推理步骤的明晰度、推论依据和应用范围的不同."效"与演绎法之同在于都体现了演绎推理的性质;它们之异则表现在其特征、具有论式和作用的差异方面. |
| 关 键 词： | " 推" " 效" 归谬法 演绎法 |
| 文章编号： | 1002-5227(2004)04-0130-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004-09-09 |
Comparisons between Mohist "Tui" and "Xiao" and Aristotelian Reduction to Absurdity and Deductive Methods |
|
| XU Jin-yun. Comparisons between Mohist "Tui" and "Xiao" and Aristotelian Reduction to Absurdity and Deductive Methods[J]. Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University, 2004, 25(4): 130-132 | |
| Authors: | XU Jin-yun |
| Abstract: | Mohist and Aristotle talked about many kinds of inferential forms, which embody the differences in the modes of thinking between the ancient China and the ancient West. This thesis makes some comparisons and analysis to their important inferential forms -"Tui" and "Xiao" and reduction to absurdity and deduction, which clearly point out the similar essence and the different characteristics of the Chinese logic and the Western logic, showing the effect of modes of thinking on the Chinese and the Westerners in later ages, and helping blaze new trails in modern thinking of way. |
| Keywords: | Tui Xiao Reduction to Absurdity Deduction |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |