我国“放管服”改革成效评估与展望

目的/意义 近年来，“放管服”改革已成为学术界研究的热点主题，十九大的胜利召开对“放管服”改革也提出了新的要求和指导建议。因此，系统梳理和比较国内“放管服”改革研究状况，对今后“放管服”改革的理论与实践推进具有重要意义。 设计/方法 选取国内“放管服”改革研究的重要期刊文献，对比分析十九大召开前后国内“放管服”改革研究的整体发展现状及研究内容差异。 结论/发现 十九大召开前后“放管服”改革的研究热点主题存在“差异多、共性少”的特点，而研究团队则表现为“共性多、差异少”，研究内容则呈现出“大同小异”的高度一致性特点。从内涵和问题优化上看，前后阶段表现为“共性少、差异多”；而从实践模式及效果评价上看，前后阶段表现为继承与发扬的关系，后阶段研究是对前期研究的持续深入推进。最后，从强化研究团队间的沟通合作，深入推进案例和实证研究，增加定性与定量相结合的混合研究三个方面提出未来研究展望。

Research Comparison and Future Prospects of the Reforms to Delegate Power,Streamline Administration and Optimize Government Services

[Purpose/Significance] In recent years, the “reforms to delegate power, streamline administration and optimize government services” have become a hot topic in academic research, and the successful convening of the 19th National Congress of the CPC has also put forward new requirements and guiding suggestions for the reforms. Therefore, the systematic analysis and comparison of the current reforms in China will play an important role in promoting the theory and practice of the reform in the future. [Design/Methodology] This paper selects important journals, compares and analyzes the overall research development and differences of the reforms before and after the 19th National Congress of the CPC. [Findings/Conclusions] The research hot topics before and after the 19th National Congress of the CPC has the characteristics of “ more differences and less commonality”, while the research team shows “more commonality and fewer differences”, and the research content shows the highly consistent characteristics of “much about the same”. From the point of view of connotation and problem optimization, there is “less commonality and fewer differences” between the former and the latter stages; while from the point of view of practice mode and effect evaluation, there is an inheritance and development relationship between the former stage and the latter stage, and research in the latter stage is the continuous and in-depth research of the former stage. Finally, this paper puts forward the future research from three aspects: strengthening the communication and cooperation between the research teams, promoting the case and empirical research in depth, and increasing the qualitative and quantitative mixed research.