首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

规模不经济下奖惩机制对闭环供应链制造商合作策略影响
引用本文:石纯来,聂佳佳.规模不经济下奖惩机制对闭环供应链制造商合作策略影响[J].中国管理科学,2019,27(3):85-95.
作者姓名:石纯来  聂佳佳
作者单位:西南交通大学经济管理学院, 四川 成都 610031
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71531009,71672153,71572156);四川省软科学研究计划项目(2016ZR0055);四川循环经济研究中心规划项目(XHJJ-1515);四川省社会科学重点研究基地四川省电子商务与现代物流研究中心课题(DSWL16-6)
摘    要:存在第三方回收商的闭环供应链中,研究了制造商规模不经情形下,政府奖惩机制对其合作策略的影响。分别构建了制造商仅与零售商(回收商)合作、制造商与零售商和回收商都合作以及均不合作四种合作策略。研究发现:制造商与零售商或回收商均存在合作动机。但是其合作动机的大小则与制造商规模不经济系数及政府奖惩力度有关。若制造商规模不经济系数较小:当政府奖惩力度较小时,制造商倾向与零售商合作;当政府奖惩力度较大时,制造商更倾向与回收商合作;若制造商规模不经济系数较大,制造商总是倾向与回收商合作。此外,无论制造商与零售商或回收商合作总是有利增加旧产品回收总量。

关 键 词:规模不经济  奖惩机制  闭环供应链  合作策略  
收稿时间:2017-05-05
修稿时间:2018-01-23

The Effects of Premium and Penalty Mechanism on Manufacturer's Cooperative Strategies in the Closed-loop Supply Chain with Production Diseconomies
SHI Chun-lai,NIE Jia-jia.The Effects of Premium and Penalty Mechanism on Manufacturer's Cooperative Strategies in the Closed-loop Supply Chain with Production Diseconomies[J].Chinese Journal of Management Science,2019,27(3):85-95.
Authors:SHI Chun-lai  NIE Jia-jia
Institution:School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
Abstract:To achieve higher supply chain efficiency and improve completive edge, the manufacturer can cooperate with other member in the closed-loop supply chain. Even though conventional wisdoms such as Nie (2012) and Ma et al. (2016) studied industry profits of different cooperative models in closed-loop supply chain, they ignored the fact that many countries set premium and penalty mechanism to order manufactures to engage in remanufacturing fields. Then scholars did not consider that situation that manufacturers maybe be under scale diseconomies as well. Therefore, the effects of premium and penalty mechanism on manufacturer's cooperative strategies in the closed-loop supply chain consisting of a manufacturer, a retailer and a recycler under manufacturer's scale diseconomies are investigated. First, whether the manufacture has an incentive to cooperative with another member is explored. Second, we need to explore which kind of cooperation bring more profit increment for partners. Third, how different cooperation affect the industry profit is analyzed.
To settle these problems, four cooperative models based on game theory:no cooperation mode (Model N), cooperation only with the recycler (Model MC), and cooperation only with the retailer (Model MR), and cooperation with both the retailer and recycler (Model MCR) are developed. Model MCR and N just are made as benchmarks. Especially, Model MCR is the upper bound, and Model N is the bottom in these models. Through our analysis, it is found that the manufacturer always has an incentive to cooperate with recycler or retailer. However, whether it is more possible to cooperate with the retailer or recycler depends on both production diseconomies and degree of premium and penalty mechanism. If both production diseconomy and degree of premium and penalty are small, the manufacturer prefers to cooperate with the retailer. Otherwise, the manufacturer prefers to cooperate with the recycler. The relations of industry profits in different models are still decided by both production diseconomies and degree of premium and penalty mechanism. In addition, the collecting quantity of end-of-life product always improves thanks to the alliance between the manufacturer and the retailer or recycler.
Keywords:production diseconomies  premium and penalty mechanism  closed-loop supply chain  cooperative strategy  
点击此处可从《中国管理科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国管理科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号