Sociologists,social policy and the Estranged poor: The selective inattention to the limits of success

Current antipoverty initiatives have been given impetus by the rediscovery of an “underclass”—a social category widely considered to be a distinctive subset of the poor. In the ensuing discussion, this aggregate has been related the Estranged Poor after Hochschild (1989). Social interventions granted the imprimatur of success are most frequently presented and/or interpreted as if they are applicable to all of the poor. It is argued here that this is an unwarranted exaggeration of effectiveness. The concept of a helping mismatch is introduced suggesting an intrinsic lack of articulation between formal agents of social intervention and the Estranged Poor who are therefore bypassed by even the most successful programs. Strains to exaggeration are described and explained as consequences of structural aspects of the remedial action system. Sociologists involved in social intervention have largely ignored the selectivity of success and too often prescribed directions for remedial action, which are irrelevant to the Estranged Poor. To acknowledge the limits of success can only encourage a more rational pursuit of our humanistic goals through the development of different approaches and strategies and, not incidentally, contribute to the credibility of our profession.