| 论道家的境界形而上学 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 宁新昌.论道家的境界形而上学[J].佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版),2007,25(1):27-31. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 宁新昌 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 佛山科学技术学院,政治与行政管理学系,广东,佛山,528000 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 广东省哲学社会科学规划项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 牟宗三把道家哲学界定为境界形而上学,但他认为"道"不具有客观性、实体性和能动性.蒙培元认为老子的哲学是一种境界形态的哲学,提出"道"是实存或实在,但不承认"道"的独立性和本源性.实际上,在老子那里"道"是具有客观性和能动性的,也有独立性和本源性.但这并不影响他的哲学的境界形而上学意义.中西哲学差异主要在于,西方哲学的形而上学的"学"主要是在学问、学说意义上的,中国哲学的形而上学的"学"则凸显的是"觉悟"的意义;而且中国哲学所说的本体并未远离人而存在.
|
| 关 键 词： | 道家 境界 形而上学 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-018X(2007)01-0027-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年10月13 |
On the Metaphysical State of Tao School |
| |
| NING Xin-chang.On the Metaphysical State of Tao School[J].Journal of Foshan University(Social Science),2007,25(1):27-31. |
| |
| Authors: | NING Xin-chang |
| |
| Abstract: | Mo Zong-san defines phylosophical circle of Tao School as metaphysical state,contrary to Meng Pei-yuan's idea of material state which argues that "Tao" is an entity or existence,not an individual and source,Mo insists "Tao" is not objective,ontological and active.In fact,their ideas are all included in "Tao" of Confucias.However it doesn't shake his significance of metaphysical state.The main difference in metaphysics between China and West is that the science of metaphysics in the West stresses on "learning and ideas",while in China on "spontaneity" and the subjectivity in Chinese philosophy does not exist beyong man. |
| |
| Keywords: | "Tao" School state metaphysics |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
