首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“枉法仲裁罪”的学理质疑
引用本文:韩平.“枉法仲裁罪”的学理质疑[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2011,28(3):70-74.
作者姓名:韩平
作者单位:深圳大学法学院,广东深圳,518060
摘    要:《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(六)》规定了"枉法仲裁罪",旨在监督仲裁员,保护当事人的利益。然而,该罪名的设立带来了难以解决的问题和无法避免的负面影响,包括违背仲裁本质、难以准确定罪、破坏"一裁终局"、打击仲裁员积极性,以及有损我国仲裁国际形象等。可见,"枉法仲裁罪"的设立弊大于利。因此,完善我国"贿赂罪"的相关规定,惩治仲裁员受贿、索贿行为,才是更为可取的做法。

关 键 词:仲裁员责任  枉法裁决  仲裁员贿赂

Discussing "Law-violating Arbitration"
HAN Ping.Discussing "Law-violating Arbitration"[J].Journal of Shenzhen University(Humanities & Social Sciences),2011,28(3):70-74.
Authors:HAN Ping
Institution:HAN Ping(School of Law,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen,Guangdong,518000,China)
Abstract:The sixth amendment to the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China has established the criminality of ’Law-violating Arbitration’,in order to regulate arbitrators and protect the lawsuit parties’ legal interests.However,the ’Law-violating Arbitration’ article brings several necessary problems and adverse effects,including difficulties in judging whether an arbitral award is law-bending,how to deal with law-bending behaviors in foreign-related arbitration and foreign arbitration,and other adverse effects on arbitrators and the international image of Chinese arbitration.In a word,turning ’Law-Violating Arbitration’ into a criminal offence is not a good way to regulate arbitrators.Laying down clear provisions against bribery of arbitrators would be a more reasonable and effective way.
Keywords:responsibility of arbitrators  law-violating arbitration  bribery of arbitrators
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号