Comparing reactive Kanban and reactive CONWIP

This paper compares a reactive Kanban system to a reactive CONWIP system under conditions of unstable changes in demand using simulation experiments. After an introduction, a model of the JIT ordering systems, the Kanban and the CONWIP systems, is constructed. In order to obtain the fundamental information for developing a control rule of buffer size, the performance of the two types of the JIT ordering systems is analysed under various stable-demand conditions by simulation experiments. Based on the results, the reactive JIT ordering systems are proposed, and the performance of the proposed systems is investigated. The results showed that both of the proposed systems can react to unstable changes in demand and maintain the mean waiting time of demand at less than the required level. In the reactive Kanban system, the total of the mean work-in-process inventories becomes much less than that in the traditional Kanban system without controlling buffer size. However, in the reactive CONWIP system, the total of the mean work-in-process inventories becomes much more than or nearly equal to that in the traditional CONWIP system without controlling buffer size under the strongly correlated or the weakly correlated processing times, respectively. Based on the results, it can be claimed that, in the proposed systems, the reactive Kanban system is more effective to react to unstable changes in demand than the reactive CONWIP system.