首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

我国法律方法的三个逻辑前提
引用本文:葛洪义,李晓辉.我国法律方法的三个逻辑前提[J].云南大学学报(社会科学版),2010,9(2):42-46.
作者姓名:葛洪义  李晓辉
作者单位:1. 华南理工大学,广州,510006
2. 厦门大学,厦门,361005
摘    要:在我国,法律方法问题在21世纪初之所以会被提出并受到学界的广泛关注,其原因在于它具有三个逻辑前提,这就是社会政治经济文化问题的法律化,法律问题的专业化、知识化,以及专业法律问题解决方式上的制度化.法律方法存在的第一个逻辑前提,就是法律的存在;法律作为一个专业化与知识领域的存在,则构成了法律方法存在的第二个逻辑前提,其标志性事件是法律硕士教育制度的形成与法律职业化和国家司法考试制度的建立;法律问题的专业化、知识化,则需要依赖特定的制度和技术开展工作,为专业化的法律问题的解决创造良好的制度条件,使法律人能够以专业技术解决法律问题,是法律方法形成的第三个逻辑前提.

关 键 词:法律方法  法律  法律职业化  法律制度

Three Logical Premises of the Legal Methods in China
GE Hong-yi and Li Xiao-hui.Three Logical Premises of the Legal Methods in China[J].Journal of Yunnan Yniversity,2010,9(2):42-46.
Authors:GE Hong-yi and Li Xiao-hui
Abstract:In China, the issue of the legal methods has received new concerns in the early 21st century because it is related to three logical premises, that is, the legalization of the social, political, economic and cultural problems, the specialization of legal problems and the related education, and the institutionalization of the problem-solving approaches. The first premise of the existence of legal methods is the existence of laws; the second premise is the existence of law as a special domain of knowledge, whose symbols are the establishment of the JM education system and the professionalization of law as well as the national judicial examination system. The third premise finds expression in the legal work based on some special system and technology, and the good institutional conditions for solving special legal problems by legal professionals.
Keywords:
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《云南大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《云南大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号