Formalism in the social sciences,rhetorically speaking |
| |
Authors: | Donald N. McCloskey |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) University of Iowa, Poroi, 701 Seashore Hall, 52242 Iowa City, IA |
| |
Abstract: | Even formal methods in economics, which sociologists have been tempted to adopt, are “rhetorical,” in the sense of “argued to other scholars, not proven forever and ever.” The rhetoric of inquiry, in other words, is not confined to flowery language. Two examples of formal methods that have defective rhetorics are significance tests (in which the sociologists are far ahead) and existence theorems (in which the sociologists are in danger of imitating the economists’ errors). Much effort in economics is spent on a rhetoric without conclusions. A more humanistic economics — or sociology—would examine all the arguments, whether mathematical or not. He is also director of the Project on Rhetoric of Inquiry. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|