| 法律概念的意义流变——以传统三大法学流派为参照 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴丙新.法律概念的意义流变——以传统三大法学流派为参照[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(1):129-134. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴丙新 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东大学威海分校,法学院,山东,威海,264209 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 自然法学、分析法学以及社会法学在本体论上的基本立场,决定了其对法律概念进行解释的不同路径。但我们发现,在逻辑操作上,前两者实际上都在最后陷入不可知论,而后者则使法律的确定性荡然无存。因而,采取何种策略解释法律概念,并使其承载法律价值功能得以充分发挥,将逼迫我们在法律本体论上进行重新选择。
|
| 关 键 词： | 法律概念 自然法学 分析法学 社会法学 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-9839(2007)01-0129-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年5月8日 |
The changing of legal concept's means: on the views of three legal theory schools |
| |
| WU Bing-xin.The changing of legal concept''''s means: on the views of three legal theory schools[J].Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences),2007(1):129-134. |
| |
| Authors: | WU Bing-xin |
| |
| Abstract: | The difference ontology attitudes which natural law jurisprudence,analytic jurisprudence and social jurisprudence owns,decide the difference ways which they deal with the interpretation of legal concept.We find that the two former schools always run into agnosticism in the logical operation,but the latter leads to absolutely uncertainty.So,in order to release the means of legal concept,we have to choose a proper view of legal ontology. |
| |
| Keywords: | legal concept natural law jurisprudence analytic jurisprudence social jurisprudence |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
