“故意伤害罪致人重伤”情节量刑均衡的比较论证

罪刑应当均衡，但是实然与应然的状态总是存在着一定的差距。仅看“故意伤害罪致人重伤”情节的量刑，轻重没有明显的不妥，但当与其他同等量刑档次犯罪及其情节相比较时，便会发现存在着罪刑不均衡之嫌。是本罪的该情节量刑轻了，还是他罪的量刑重了，亦或其他？这是罪刑均衡理论中需要解决的一个具体细节问题。

On the Balance of Penalty Measurement between Crime of Intentionally Injuring Another Which Resulted in Griveous Bodily Harm and Other Crimes

There should be balance between crime and punishment, but differences exist between what ought to be and what is. We can not decide whether the crime of inteutionally injuring another which resulted in griveous bodily harm is sentenced appropriately, but when it is compared with other crimes of the same penalty grade we may find there are some inbalance between crime and punishment. Is this sentence is too light or other sentences are too heavy or other problems？ This should be resolved in matching of crime and penalty.