论中国专家辅助人制度完善——以借鉴大陆法系国家相关制度为视角

2012年《刑事诉讼法》增设了专家辅助人，作为诉讼角色能够帮助法庭就鉴定意见进行有效质证，在保证庭审实质性的同时促进“审判中心主义”的实现。在司法实践中，专家辅助人制度没能发挥其应有的价值，具体运行规则的缺失是导致这一情况的最主要原因之一——关于专家辅助人的诉讼地位、诉讼权利和专家意见的证据属性等问题法律都没有明确的规定。在俄罗斯、意大利等大陆法系国家，专家辅助人相关制度已经有效运行了几十年。在中国未来的司法改革中应当借鉴其他国家的成熟经验，完善“专家辅助人”制度的相关规定——确定专家辅助人的辩护人诉讼地位，明确其相应的诉讼权利，例如鉴定情况通知权、鉴定内容建议权和阅卷权等，这样专家辅助人制度能够更加有效运行。

The Perfection of Expert Assistant System Under Trial Centralism Policy——From the Perspective of the Introduction of Related Regulations in Civil Law Countries

The Article 192 of Chinese Criminal Procedural Code provides that,the prosecutor,litigants and the counsels have the right to apply for the writ of the court summoning the expert assistant to attend the court and make a judgment about the expert opinion,which guarantees the accuracy of forensic science and clear the hindrance to the Trial Centralism Policy. However,without the rules of the implementation,because of the omission of duty,status,right and responsibility of the expert assistant,the aim of the law can hardly be realized. Throughout the world,the expert assistant system is not the initiative of China,in Russia and Italy the related regulations are extremely sophisticated and the introduction of which into China can help us to perfect the system and to implement the Trial Centralism Policy.