|
|||||
|
|
| 国际航空旅客运输中精神损害赔偿的比较法探讨 | |
| 引用本文： | 韩冰. 国际航空旅客运输中精神损害赔偿的比较法探讨[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版), 2012, 0(3): 78-82 |
| 作者姓名： | 韩冰 |
| 作者单位： | 上海政法学院法律学院,上海,201701 |
| 摘 要： | 在重视消费者利益、保护人权的大趋势下,精神损害赔偿成为各国适用1929年《统一国际航空运输某些规则公约》难以回避的理论难题。在大量的司法判例中,美国法院根据精神损害与身体损害的关系,逐步归纳出人身损害赔偿的若干类型,对纯精神损害也有所突破。这些判例被其他国家广泛借鉴,也势必会影响全新的1999年《蒙特利尔公约》的适用。 |
| 关 键 词： | 《统一国际航空运输某些规则的公约》 判例 人身伤害 精神损害赔偿 |
A Comparative Study on Emotional Injury Compensation in International Air Passenger Transportation |
|
| Han Bing. A Comparative Study on Emotional Injury Compensation in International Air Passenger Transportation[J]. Journal of Ocean University of China, 2012, 0(3): 78-82 | |
| Authors: | Han Bing |
| Affiliation: | Han Bing(School of Law,Shanghai University of Political Science of Law,Shanghai 201701,China) |
| Abstract: | In a climate of protecting comsumer interests and human rights,emotional injury compensation has become a theoretical difficulty for all nations to which the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating International Carriage by Air passed in1929 is applicable.In abundant cases,based on the relation between bodily injury and emotional injury,American courts have generalized a variety of types of bodily injury and also made a breakthrough in the field of pure emotional injury.These cases have now been widely referred to by other nations,and will definitely affect the application of the Montreal Convention adopted in 1999. |
| Keywords: | Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating International Carriage by Air case emotional injury compensation personal injury |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |