首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论王安石义利观的历史评价
引用本文:欧阳辉纯.论王安石义利观的历史评价[J].宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版),2011(6):33-38.
作者姓名:欧阳辉纯
作者单位:中国人民大学哲学院
摘    要:对王安石义利观的评价,有"道义论"否定性的评价和"功利论"肯定性的评价。古代"道义论"的评价主要来自两个方面:一是封建专制主义"政统"论;一是理学家"道统"论。朱熹从"道统"论中"道问学"角度来否定,陆九渊则从"道统"论的"尊德性"的角度来否定。"功利论"肯定性的评价有三种:古代功利论、近代资产阶级功利论、马克思主义功利论。如果说道义论是从传统"义"的角度来否定王安石的义利观,那么,功利论则是从"利"的角度来肯定。

关 键 词:王安石  义利观  道义论  功利论

On the History Evaluation of Wang Anshi’s Viewpoint on Justice and Interests
Institution:OUYANG Hui-chun(Philosophy College,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872)
Abstract:The history evaluation of viewpoint on justice and interests by Wang Anshi is mainly as follows: negative evaluation of ancient "moral theory"and positive evaluation "utilitarian theory".Ancient "moral theory"comes mainly from two aspects: On the one hand,negative evaluation of the feudal autocratic,"political unification",on the other hand,the negation of "Dao unification" of Neo-Confucianism.Zhuxi conducted negation from the perspective of "Dao learning" within "Dao unification",and Lu Jiuyuan conducted criticism from the angle of "Respect Virtue" "Road unification" within "Dao unification".There are three kinds of positive evaluation in Utilitarian theory,Ancient utilitarian theory,such as Chengliang and Yeshi;modern bourgeois utilitarian theory,for example,Liang Qichao and utilitarian theory of Marxism,for instance,Deng Guangming.The moral theory negated Wang Anshi's viewpoint on justice and interests from the perspective of traditional "justice",while utilitarian theory negated it from the perspective of justice.
Keywords:Wang Anshi  viewpoint on justice and interests  moral theory  utilitarian theory
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号