首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论不真正不作为犯作为义务的法定性
引用本文:刘斯凡. 论不真正不作为犯作为义务的法定性[J]. 武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2009, 11(6): 65-68,74
作者姓名:刘斯凡
作者单位:武汉科技大学,文法与经济学院,湖北,武汉,430081
基金项目:武汉科技大学基金资助项目 
摘    要:在不真正不作为犯中,作为义务来源和作为义务没有被严格区分,导致作为义务来源理论的自相矛盾、作为义务的实质判断标准得不到发展。作为义务的法定不是指法律的规定,而是指刑法的规定。由于刑法无法对所有的作为义务进行规定,作为义务的法定性只能从法律的精神来理解,通过刑法解释来实现,故道德义务可以是作为义务的来源。

关 键 词:不真正不作为犯  作为义务  道德义务  法定性

Legality of feasance duty in pseudo crime of nonfeasance
Liu Sifan. Legality of feasance duty in pseudo crime of nonfeasance[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition), 2009, 11(6): 65-68,74
Authors:Liu Sifan
Affiliation:Liu Sifan (College of Humanities, Law and Economics, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China)
Abstract:In the pseudo crime of nonfeasance, the source of feasance duty and the duty of feasance are not strictly distinguished leading to the self-contradiction in the theory of the source of feasance duty and little progress in practical criteria for feasance duty. The legality of feasance duty refers to the stipulations by criminal law. As criminal law cannot dictate all duties, the legality of feasance duty can only be obtained from the spirit of law and realized by means of the interpretation of criminal law. And moral duty can be the source of feasance duty.
Keywords:pseudo crime of nonfeasance  feasance duty  moral duty  legality
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号