首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

社会支配取向量表在中国的信度和效度研究
引用本文:张智勇,袁慧娟. 社会支配取向量表在中国的信度和效度研究[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2006, 32(2): 16-19
作者姓名:张智勇  袁慧娟
作者单位:北京大学心理学系 北京市100871
摘    要:
本研究尝试修订西方的社会支配取向量表.359名大学本科生参与了研究.结果表明,社会支配取向量表修订后包含14个项目,量表具有较好的内部一致性、重测信度和一定的预测效度;中国被试社会支配取向得分普遍比西方的高;中文修订量表不同于西方的单因素或者双因素结构,它包括4个因素,即"反对群体平等"、"赞同优势群体的支配性"、"赞同劣势群体的较低地位"、"赞同维持等级差异".

关 键 词:社会支配取向  社会支配性  偏差  中国文化

The Reliability and Validity of the Social Dominance Orientation Scale in China
ZOU Xin-yang,DUAN Yu-chuan,CHENG Chang-hua. The Reliability and Validity of the Social Dominance Orientation Scale in China[J]. Journal of southwest university(social science edition), 2006, 32(2): 16-19
Authors:ZOU Xin-yang  DUAN Yu-chuan  CHENG Chang-hua
Abstract:
The present study attempts to revise the western Social Dominance Orientation(SDO) Scale for the use in China.355 undergraduate students in Peking University participated in this study.We found that(A) The Chinese version of SDO Scale,which consists of 14 items,has reasonable inner consistence,re-testing reliability,and certain predictive validity.(B) Chinese students score much higher than their western counterparts in SDO Scale.(C) Different from the western version of single or double factor structure,the Chinese version of the scale has four factors,namely the "Opposition to group equality","Support for superior group's dominance","Support for inferior group's subordinacy",and"Support for maintaining group hierarchy".
Keywords:social dominance orientation  social dominance theory  bias  Chinese culture
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《西南大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《西南大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号