首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

走出"科技伦理"的误区
引用本文:孙道进.走出"科技伦理"的误区[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2004,30(2).
作者姓名:孙道进
作者单位:南京大学哲学系 江苏南京210093
摘    要:"科技伦理"在实践上是行不通的.它无视个体主体与社会主体在实践职能上的异质性,把本该由社会主体甚至类主体所承担的社会伦理责任强加于科技工作者个体主体的头上;它抹杀了伦理学的阶级性质,忽视了"主体际性"或"交往"对于科技主体的引导和制约作用;它是批判科技决定论形式下的变相的科技决定论,过高估计了科学技术及其主体对人类历史同时也是实践史的作用和影响,从而问接否认了唯物主义的"历史合力论".科技的社会伦理取向只能导致科技的停滞甚至被取消,这对于科学技术本身以及人类的生存和发展恰恰是非人道的、不伦理的,这就是"科技伦理"的悖论.

关 键 词:科技伦理  实践  主体际  阶级性  科技决定论  历史合力论

Coming out the Mistake Area of“ Sci-tech Ethics”
SUN Dao-jin.Coming out the Mistake Area of“ Sci-tech Ethics”[J].Journal of Southwest University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition),2004,30(2).
Authors:SUN Dao-jin
Abstract:Science and technology must seek not only for the truth, but also for the good, for the ultimate value of the human being and the benefit of all the people". This thought of sci-tech Ethics is impracticable, because it takes no difference between the practical function of individual subject and that of society or mankind subject, imposes on the scientists and engineers the social ethical duty only the society or mankind can and must take on, and ignores the inductive and restrictive effects of intersubjectivity and communication on individual subjects of science and technology. It is a kind of sci-tech determinism in disguised from animadverting on sci-tech determinism, which obliterates class character of Ethics, over-estimating the influence of science and technology to the history of humankind (at the same time, the history of practice, on other words), thus denying the theory of historical resultant force indirectly.
Keywords:sci-tech ethics  practice  intersubjectivity  class character  sci-tech determinism  the theory of historical resultant force
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《西南大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《西南大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号