| 论国际海运中的合同相对性突破与诉因 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李天生.论国际海运中的合同相对性突破与诉因[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2013(3):280-283. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李天生 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]大连海事大学法学院,大连116026 [2]国家海洋环境监测中心博士后工作站,大连116023 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目;大连海事大学优秀科技创新团队培育计划资助项目（2012TD030）. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 从合同相对性突破的理论、提单权利性质学说和国际海上货物运输实践来看,交货托运人、提单持有人、收货人等货方与承运人之间存在合同相对性突破关系,是运输合同相对性突破的主体。适用我国《海商法》时,货方与实际承运人之间通常不存在合同相对性突破的关联。货方对承运人的诉因一般为违约,对实际承运人诉因一般为侵权,少数情况下才会出现诉因选择权。
|
| 关 键 词： | 货方 承运人 实际承运人 合同相对性突破 诉因 |
Breaching of Privity of Contract and Cause of Action in International Carriage of Goods by Sea |
| |
| Li Tiansheng.Breaching of Privity of Contract and Cause of Action in International Carriage of Goods by Sea[J].Journal of Tianjin University(Social Sciences),2013(3):280-283. |
| |
| Authors: | Li Tiansheng |
| |
| Institution: | Li Tiansheng (1. Law School, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 110326, China; 2. National Marine Environment Monitoring Center, Dalian 116023, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Based on theories of breaching of privity of contract, character academics of rights bill of lading and practices of carriage of goods by sea, the cargo owner parties, including actual consignors, holders of bill of lading and consignees, are subjects of breaching of privity of transport contract. Under Chinese Maritime Law, there are generally non-existent relationship of breaching the privities of contract between the cargo owner parties and the actual carriers. Cargo owner parties＇ cause of action against carriers is generally breach of contract; the cause of action for the cargo owner parties to bring against actual carriers is usually tort, and the right of choice of cause of action exists in few cases. |
| |
| Keywords: | cargo owner parties carriers actual carriers breach of the privity of contract cause of action |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
