对赛义德后殖民主义文学批评的批评

赛义德的后殖民主义文学批评在世界范围内引起争议 ,方兴未艾.为在全球化语境下正确处理文学的民族关系,有必要进一步剖析赛义德后殖民主义文学批评的立场和观点,总结其文学批评的宝贵启示和得失教训,以达到取精用宏,丰富我国文学民族学理论的目的.赛义德文学观的反殖民主义立场值得肯定,但他未能客观理解殖民运动的必然性,混同政治与文学的界限,苛责西方进步作家,使他的反殖民主义愿望反而起到助长殖民主义的作用,这是必须予以澄清和克服的.而且,区分文学的题材和内容, 理清文学与政治的关系,甚至淡化东、西方地理疆域而重视其思想疆域,都是文学研究不可忽视的问题.

A Critique of Said's Postcolonial Literary Critic Theory

Said's postcolonial literary critic theory has evoked worldwide repercussions.For a better understanding of the ethnic relations in literature in the international context,a further study is desired on the nature of Said's critic theory.It is believed the findings will be conducive to the enrichment of our theory of ethnic literature.We regard his anti-colonialism as positive,but we must realize Said did not find out the inevitability of colonizing movement.He confused politics with literature,which,as a consequence,aided the colonialism.