首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

"核心期刊":一个外来"文"种入侵、异化为害的典型事例——《"核心期刊"与期刊评价》读后
引用本文:靳青万."核心期刊":一个外来"文"种入侵、异化为害的典型事例——《"核心期刊"与期刊评价》读后[J].河北理工大学学报(社会科学版),2007,7(1):194-196.
作者姓名:靳青万
作者单位:漳州师范学院,学报编辑部,福建,漳州,363000
摘    要:“核心期刊”的理论与实践均是外来“文”种入侵中国后发展、异化的产物。它所依据的“载文量”与“被引率”两大量化指标只不过具有文献计量学上的意义,并不反映期刊和期刊上所载文献(论文)的质量与水平,充其量只反映了某一专业、某一专题文献较为集中地分布于一些期刊上而已。这两项指标甚至连文献(论文)的好、坏、对、错都未能区分,所以它根本不能作为评刊、评文、评学、评人的质量或水平标准。

关 键 词:“核心期刊”  入侵  异化为害
文章编号:1673-2804(2007)01-0194-03
修稿时间:2006年6月9日

"Core Journal" :A Quintesscnce of Foreign" Academic Species" Invading and Dissimilating as a Calamity——Reading Professor QIAN Rong-gui's Core Journal and Journal Appraising
JIN Qing-wan."Core Journal" :A Quintesscnce of Foreign" Academic Species" Invading and Dissimilating as a Calamity——Reading Professor QIAN Rong-gui''''s Core Journal and Journal Appraising[J].Journal of Hebei Polytechnic University(Social Science Edition),2007,7(1):194-196.
Authors:JIN Qing-wan
Abstract:Both the theory and the practice of "core journal" are the results of foreign"academic species" propagating and dissimilating after its invading China.Although significant in the sense of bibliometrics,the two indexes of"paper quantity" and "quotation rate"cannot reflect the academic quality and level of the papers published in the core journals.They,at most,indicate that some papers on a certain field or topic are collectively published in these journals.The two indexes,however,are unable to discriminate papers/bibliographies between good and bad,and between right and wrong,thus they cannot serve as the standards of appraising a journal,a paper,academic level and even a scholar at all.It is the time to call the end of "core journal" calamities in China.
Keywords:"Core Journal"  Journal Appraising  invasion  dissimilating as a calamity  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号