从醉酒犯罪论我国原因自由行为之立法

通说认为，中国大陆刑法对原因自由行为理论仅在刑法第18条第4款上涉及。立法上，该条款不分情况的“一刀切”模式不符合法理和情理。立法的不完善直接导致司法实践中出现错误的处理思路，司法实务人员倾向于直接引用该条款追究行为人的完全刑事责任。以醉酒犯罪为切入口来探讨原因自由行为，重点针对司法实践中亟待解决的关键问题，借鉴域外关于自陷行为之立法例，探讨我国立法之困境，对其进行反思与完善，得出既适用于一般又考虑个别的“总则加分则”的立法模式。

A Research on Legislation of Actio Libera in Causa from Drunken Crime

Commonly believed that criminal law only involves the theory of actio libera in causa on The fourth paragraph of article eighteenth.The terms regardless of the case of “one size fits all”mode in legislation,which is not in line with legal and reasonable.Imperfection of the legislation led directly to the treatment of errors in judicial practice,judicial personnel tend to refere to the terms directly to account for complete criminal responsibility.States tend to study Actio libera in causa beginning with drunk crime,so does this paper.This article focuses on urgent problem in judicial practice ,discuss the dilemma,give reflections and suggestions of Chinese legislation referring to extraterritorial.It obtains that the mode of “General Provisions add to Specific Provisions”,which both applies generally and considers individually ,is the best selection for legislation that complies with the legal order and fits for legislative concept of contemporary China.