| 论量刑自由裁量权及其规制 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈海平,周高仪.论量刑自由裁量权及其规制[J].河南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2007,25(2):100-103. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈海平 周高仪 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 燕山大学,文法学院,河北,秦皇岛,066004 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 燕山大学校科研和教改项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国刑事立法没有赋予法官在量刑上的自由裁量权,但是量刑自由裁量权在司法实践中大量存在却是不可回避的事实。立法与实践的分野使长期摇摆于两个极端之间的量刑自由裁量权既不稳定也不安宁。承认并规制是对待量刑自由裁量权的理性态度。
|
| 关 键 词： | 刑事立法 量刑 自由裁量权 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-3910(2007)02-0100-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年9月23日 |
Discretion and Restriction of Measure Punishment |
| |
| CHEN Hai-ping,ZHOU Gao-yi.Discretion and Restriction of Measure Punishment[J].Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology:Social science,2007,25(2):100-103. |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Hai-ping ZHOU Gao-yi |
| |
| Abstract: | Discretion of measure has not been endowed with judger in criminal legislation, but it is inevitable in judicature practice. Thus, it is unstable between lawmaking and reality, which always incompatible. The reasonable attitude is to acknowledge and restrict the discretion of measure. |
| |
| Keywords: | criminal lawmaking measure punishment discretion of measure |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
