李泽厚与陈炎的儒道互补研究之比较

李泽厚与陈炎对于儒道为什么能互补、如何互补、互补的结果、如何评价这一互补等问题 ,有着不同的回答。比较而言 ,李泽厚为适应“自然人化”理论 ,针对“儒道对立说”的偏颇 ,更强调两家的同一 ,并选取了多种方法来阐发自己的主张 ;陈炎坚持“价值中立”、“方法多元” ,以区别于周而复始的重新评价和单一的“学术规范” ,因而能够从严格的学术意义上解释儒道之间相互补充的辩证关系 ,揭示这两大文化源泉在民族历史及美学史上的整体功能

Contrast on Study of Complementary Confucianism and Taoism between LI Ze-hou and CHEN Yan

LI Ze hou and CHEN Yan have different answers to questions like "Why can Confucianism and Taoism complement each other?" "How do they complement?""What is the consequence of complementarity?" "How to appraise the complementarity?" etc. Relatively, countering the prejudice of "opposite Confucianism and Taoism" and also, in order to fit the theory of "natural humanization", LI Ze hou further emphasized their identity and expounded his ideas on different aspects; CHEN Yan, however, insisted on "value neutrality" and "pluralistic methods" to identify himself from cyclic reappraisal and single "scientific norm", so he could explain the dialectical relation on their complementarity between Confucianism and Taoism in a rigid scientific sense, and discover the entire function of the two culture sources on national history and aesthetics history.