首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

物上请求权与诉讼时效之适用
引用本文:张在范.物上请求权与诉讼时效之适用[J].河南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2004,22(3):107-109.
作者姓名:张在范
作者单位:河南师范大学,法律系,河南,新乡,453000
摘    要:所有物返还请求权与排除妨害、预防妨害请求权虽同为物上请求权 ,但无论是在客体上还是在法律后果上两者之间存在着很大差异。对它们能否适用诉讼时效的问题不应一概而论 ,而应区别对待。除已登记财产之返还请求权可以不适用诉讼时效外 ,排除妨害、预防妨害请求权以及未登记财产之返还请求权均应适用诉讼时效

关 键 词:物上请求权  诉讼时效  所有物返还请求权
文章编号:1672-3910(2004)03-0107-03
修稿时间:2004年3月6日

Application of the time limitation of action and the rights of the owner
ZHANG Zai-fan.Application of the time limitation of action and the rights of the owner[J].Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology:Social science,2004,22(3):107-109.
Authors:ZHANG Zai-fan
Abstract:There are three main rights of the owner,such as the right of the owner to reobtain the property,the right of the owner to eliminate the obstacles and the right of the owner to prevent to infringement.But the former and the rest are quite different in its objects and its legal consequence .One of the big difference between them is whether they can apply the time limitation of action.The author points out the right of elimination and the right of prevention and the right of owner whose properties are registered to reobtain his (her) property can't apply the time limitation of action.
Keywords:the rights of the owner  the time limitation of action  right of the owner to reobtain the property  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号