藏羌彝走廊的研究路径

由于费孝通在20世纪80年代的多次强调,"藏彝走廊"问题开始被学者们所关注,学者们开始了大量的实际的调查、研究。然而"藏彝走廊"的概念中缺失了本应该包含在内的羌族历史文化的强调,羌族历史文化的强调对于走廊的历史及现状的理解应该具有不可替代的积极意义,近年来的羌语支((Qiangic或Kiangic))研究足以说明这一问题。为弥补这一明显缺陷,本文首先由历史及现状出发,强调古羌在民族走廊中的历史作用,进而提出民族走廊的正确命名应该为"藏羌彝走廊"的观点。在此基础上,梳理"藏羌彝走廊"研究的历史及现在的研究路径,并指出跨学科的综合性研究才是"藏羌彝走廊"研究的有效方法。

The Research Approach of Zang-Qiang-Yi Corridor

Before the establishment of New China,the "ethnic corridors" research has begun by Ma Changshou and Tao Yunkui.But in the 1950s and 1960s,this research has failed to be integrated into the large-scale "Nationality Recognition" Campaign.As Fei Xiaotong had repeatedly stressed this kind of research in the 1980s,Chinese scholars began to concern about the "Zang-Yi Corridor" with many investigations and researches.However,the concept of "Zang-Yi Corridor" neglects Qiang’s history and culture,a positive element for understanding the history and the status quo of the corridor.Recent researches on the Qiang language branch (Qiangic or Kiangic) prove it.To compensate for the obvious defects,starting with the historical and current situation,this paper emphasizes the ancient Qiang’s historical role in the ethnic corridor and puts forward the correct name of the ethnic corridors should be "Zang-Qiang-Yi Corridor" .Finally,by summarizing the history and approaches of the "Zang-Qiang-Yi Corridor" study,the author proposes that interdisciplinary comprehensive study is an effective way to study "Zang-Qiang-Yi Corridor".