关于<中华人民共和国合同法>的几点看法

<合同法>区分了合同成立与合同生效,并分别作出了具体规定,却否定了合同生效的相关规定.一方以欺诈、胁迫的手段订立的合同,规定了两种不同的法律后果,既不利于司法操作,又有悖于"合同当事人的法律地位平等"的原则.债权人转让债权时,如果在明显增加债务人的履行难度、风险或费用的情况下,法律应规定债务人有拒绝转让的权利.第189条规定既不合法也不切实际.

Opinions on the Contract Law of P.R.China

Contract law distinguishes the conclusion from the validity of a contract by concrete articles.But 189 is contradicative to the validity.There are two different legal consequences,on the condition of making contacts by fraud and coerce,which is unsuitable for the justice function and the principle of "the equal position of the parties" The law should stipulate that debtors have the right to refuse the transfer of the right by the creditors if the fulfillment difficulty?the risk and costs are thereby added.