我国文书提出义务制度运行现状及完善路径 ——基于《民诉法解释》第112条的分析

为解决民事诉讼中长期存在着“证据偏在”问题,2001年最高人民法院出台的《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》和2015年出 台的《关于适用〈中华人民共和国民事诉讼法〉的解释》都对其进行了规制,特别是后者规定了文书提出义务制度。但是过于保守 和笼统的规范在诉讼实践中表现出诸多不足,通过判决书为线索对文书提出义务在实务中的运行现状进行分析,并结合域外的制 度经验,指出其缺陷和不足之处,尝试探索完善路径。

China's Current Document Filing Obligation System and theApproaches to Its Improvement:Based onAnalysis ofArticle 112 of the Interpretation of Civil Procedure Law

To solve the long-time problem of "evidence bias" in civil litigation, the Evidence Regulations Promulgated by the Supreme People''s Court in 2001 and the Interpretation of the Civil Procedure Law in 2015 all regulate it, and the latter particularly stipulates the document filing obligation system. However, this over-conservative and general system shows quite a few deficiencies in the litigation practice. With judgments as clues, this paper offers an analysis of the current operations of document filing obligation in practice, and points out its deficiencies and explores ways to improve the system by drawing on institutional experiences of other countries.