首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

汉藏同源假说与古音研究中的若干问题——汉藏同源的谱系关系及其研究方法讨论
引用本文:张民权. 汉藏同源假说与古音研究中的若干问题——汉藏同源的谱系关系及其研究方法讨论[J]. 山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2012, 0(5): 10-17
作者姓名:张民权
作者单位:中国传媒大学文学院
基金项目:国家社科基金资助项目“万光泰音韵学稿本与汉语上古音研究”(10BYY048)
摘    要:
汉藏同源是一个未经证实的假说,其同源的历史范围及其谱系关系,迄今为止,仍是一个聚讼不决的话题,学界还没有一个令各方都能接受的研究成果,因此,汉藏同源说基本上还处于有待科学证明的过程之中。而其中研究方法至关重要,基本词汇的确定,同源词的择取和音系的比较构拟,都不能简单地从想象出发。文章就汉藏亲属语言的谱系关系及其研究方法进行了反思和检讨。

关 键 词:汉藏同源  谱系关系  时空差异  研究方法

Sino-Tibetan Language Family Hypothesis and Phonological Reconstruction of Proto-Languages: A Critical Review of Genealogical Relationship between Chinese and Tibetan and Its Research Methodology
ZHANG Min-quan. Sino-Tibetan Language Family Hypothesis and Phonological Reconstruction of Proto-Languages: A Critical Review of Genealogical Relationship between Chinese and Tibetan and Its Research Methodology[J]. Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 0(5): 10-17
Authors:ZHANG Min-quan
Affiliation:ZHANG Min-quan(School of Literature,Communication University of China,Beijing 100024,China)
Abstract:
The so-called Sino-Tibetan language family is just a unverified hypothesis,with its historical scope and the genetic relations between the two languages remaining a controversy and with no academic achievements in this area universally accepted by scholars in the linguistic community so far.The hypothesis,therefore,has yet to be proved by scientific evidence.In this process,scientific research methodology is of utmost importance.We can not identify the basic vocabulary,choose cognate words and reconstruct the phonological system merely out of our imagination.This paper is a critical review of the Sino-Tibetan language family hypothesis and its research methodology.
Keywords:Sino-Tibetan language family hypothesis  genealogical relationship  time-and-space differences  research methodology
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号