首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论我国司法解释的主体
引用本文:马冬梅,邢荣允.论我国司法解释的主体[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,29(1):90-92.
作者姓名:马冬梅  邢荣允
作者单位:北京大学,法学院,北京,100871;石家庄市中级人民法院,河北,石家庄,050061
摘    要:根据我国有关法律法规的规定,我国目前实行二元一级司法解释体制,即最高人民法院和最高人民检察院分别对法院审判工作中和检察院检察工作中具体应用法律、法规的问题具有解释权。本文从司法资源、司法效益及公正、法制统一及检察机关职能等角度出发,认为应取消最高人民检察院的司法解释权,并提出建立最高人民法院和高级人民法院一元二级司法解释体制的设想。

关 键 词:司法解释主体  一元司法解释体制  二级司法解释体制
文章编号:1005-6378(2004)01-0090-03
修稿时间:2003年10月5日

On the Subject of Judicial Interpretation
MA Dong-mei,XING Rong-yun.On the Subject of Judicial Interpretation[J].Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science),2004,29(1):90-92.
Authors:MA Dong-mei  XING Rong-yun
Institution:MA Dong-mei~1,XING Rong-yun~2
Abstract:According to the related law and regulations, the system of judicial interpretation with two subjects is operated in our country at present. In other words, the Supreme Court of the People's Republic of China and the Supreme Procuratorate of the People's Republic of China have the power of judicial interpretations during their separate law enforcement. From the angles of judicial resources, judicial benefit, judicial justice, the unity of legal system, and the function of procuratorial organ, the article holds that the power of judicial interpretation of the Supreme Procuratorate of the People's Republic of China should be canceled, and the system of the unitary judicial interpretation with two levels should be built. In a word, the Supreme Court of the People's Republic of China and all high courts should own the power of judicial interpretation.
Keywords:the subject of judicial interpretation  the system of unitary judicial interpretation  the system of two levels of judicial interpretation
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号