首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

行政诉讼重作判决的比较及其启示
引用本文:罗英.行政诉讼重作判决的比较及其启示[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2008,11(6):29-33.
作者姓名:罗英
作者单位:中南大学商学院,湖南,长沙,410083
摘    要:正确、有效地适用重作判决有利于实现撤销判决之实效,维护客观法秩序。为了更好地发挥行政诉讼重作判决的制度功能,应当将之与我国类似判决形式进行比较,主要是撤销判决与履行判决。同时要将重作判决与英国、奥地利的类似判决形式和法国、德国、日本的撤销判决效力制度进行比较。这些比较对我国行政诉讼重作判决的适用具有重要启示。

关 键 词:行政诉讼  重作判决  撤销判决

Comparison and Enlightenment of Judgment for Conducting Again in Administrative Litigation
LUO Ying.Comparison and Enlightenment of Judgment for Conducting Again in Administrative Litigation[J].journal of hunan university of science&technology,2008,11(6):29-33.
Authors:LUO Ying
Institution:LUO Ying School of Business,Centnd South University,Changsha 410083,China
Abstract:Correct and effective application of judgment for conducting again is beneficial to realize the actual ef- fect of judgment for repeal,and protect the objective order of law.In order to bring the system function of judgment for conducting again into better play,we should make a comparison between judgment for conducting again and similar judgment in China,mainly including judgment for repeal and judgment for performance,and a comparison between judgment for conducting again and similar judgment in British and Austria,as well as the system of the validity of judgment for repeal in France,Germany and Japan,which will give an important enlightenment to the application of judgment for conducting again in administrative litigation in China.
Keywords:Administrative litigation  judgment for conducting again  judgment for repeal
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号