| 马克思主义与新古典主义增长理论的比较分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 赵峰.马克思主义与新古典主义增长理论的比较分析[J].中国人民大学学报,2006(2). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 赵峰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国人民大学经济学院 北京100872 |
| |
| 基金项目： | “马克思主义经济学与西方经济学的比较”课题的资助 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对马克思主义经济学的经济增长模型与现代西方主流的新古典主义增长模型的比较分析表明,尽管二者都认为资本积累、技术进步和劳动分工在经济发展过程中起着重要的作用,但是新古典主义经济学认为资本积累、技术进步和劳动分工,从而经济发展的过程仅仅决定于一些外生给定的参数;而马克思主义则认为资本主义的生产关系对这些过程具有重要的影响。
|
| 关 键 词： | 增长理论 新古典主义 马克思主义 比较分析 |
A Comparative Analysis of Marxist and Neo-Classical Growth Theory |
| |
| ZHAO Feng.A Comparative Analysis of Marxist and Neo-Classical Growth Theory[J].Journal of Renmin University of China,2006(2). |
| |
| Authors: | ZHAO Feng |
| |
| Abstract: | The article compares the Marxist growth theory with the Neo-Classical growth model in a two-period growth model.Although both emphasize that capital accumulation,technological change and division of labor play most important role in the process of economic development,the difference between them is apparent: the Neo-Classicalism argues that capital accumulation,technological change and division of labor in the process of economic development are only determined by some exogenous parameters,while the Marxism thinks that the capitalist production relation influences those processes heavily. |
| |
| Keywords: | growth theory Neo-Classicalism Marxism comparative analysis |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
