宋代《史记》人物史评与诗评之比较举隅

《史记》自问世以来,历代的研究成果集中在对《史记》进行的补、订、注、评上,用诗歌形式研究《史记》被研究所忽略。其实,史评和诗评《史记》都应受到足够的重视。宋代苏轼的史论章《留侯论》和王安石的诗歌《张良》可谓史评与诗评之代表,从二之比较可以看出：诗评《史记》的成果不亚于史评,二相互补充,相得益彰。

Example's Comparison between Historical and Poetic Criticism from the Great Historical Record's Figures of Song Dynasty

Since Great Historical Record have been published, research results of several Dynasties to it mainly concentrated in supplement, revision, explanation and criticism. However, the researchers neglected in researching of poetic forms. Both of historical criticism and poetic criticism to Great Historical Record should be taken an importance. The historical thesis on Zhang Liang by Su Shi of Song Dynasty and the poem "Zhang Liang" by Wang Anshi of Song Dynasty, both of them have been recognized as the representations of historical criticism and poetic criticism. The results showed that by comparison: the achievement of poetic criticism to Great Historical Record is only next to that of historical criticism, both of them helped each other and benefited by associating together.