首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论人民法院不应承担证明责任
引用本文:闫丽锦.论人民法院不应承担证明责任[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版),2004,17(2):229-232.
作者姓名:闫丽锦
作者单位:武汉大学,法学院,湖北,武汉,430072
摘    要:在我国诉讼理论界,传统的观点是人民法院也承担证明责任。但随着我国刑事审判方式的改革及刑事诉讼法的不断完善,这一观点无论从理论上还是在实践中都已无法适应新的要求。文章主要从对传统观点的质疑并结合理论和现实来论证人民法院不应负证明责任,从而明确人民法院不负证明责任是实现控审职能分离、保障法院公正审判、强化公诉职能的重要途径。

关 键 词:证明责任  证明义务  刑事诉讼  法院审判
文章编号:1671-6477(2004)02-0229-04
修稿时间:2004年2月29日

People's Court Shouldn't Bear the Duty of Proof
YAN li-jin.People's Court Shouldn't Bear the Duty of Proof[J].Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Social Science Edition),2004,17(2):229-232.
Authors:YAN li-jin
Abstract:There is a traditional viewpoint in our science of criminal procedure law that people's court bears the burden of proof. But with the reforming of the system of trial and the improving of criminal procedure law, this viewpoint can't accommodate the new condition any more in our country. This thesis arguments "people's court shouldn't bear the burden of proof"which is mainly based on the inquiring of traditional viewpoint and the new theory and reality. Therefore it is cleared that "people's court shouldn't bear the burden of proof" is also an important way to realize the "division of prosecuting and trial", to protect justice and to aggrandize the ability of prosecution.
Keywords:burden of proof  duty of proof  criminal procedure  court trial
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号