首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论《公羊传》对《春秋》的解释
引用本文:刘国民.论《公羊传》对《春秋》的解释[J].湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,32(3):338-341.
作者姓名:刘国民
作者单位:中国青年政治学院,中文系,北京,100089
摘    要:《公羊传》通过《春秋》之辞、辞序、笔削、书法阐释《春秋》之义。《春秋》之辞、辞序、笔削、书法具有两个意义层次:表层义与深层义。表层义与深层义有一段距离而形成意义的“间距化”,故很难通过表层义理解深层义。《公羊传》在解释《春秋》时表现了较强的主观性,一是表层义与深层义的“间距化”,为《公羊传》发挥其主观思想留下了相当大的空间;二是一般书法与书法之变的对立统一,为《公羊传》解释《春秋》带来较大的灵活性和变通性。

关 键 词:  辞序  笔削  书法
文章编号:1001-4799(2005)03-0338-04
修稿时间:2004年5月31日

The Spring and Autumn Annals as Is Interpreted in the Biography of Gongyang
LIU Guo-min.The Spring and Autumn Annals as Is Interpreted in the Biography of Gongyang[J].Journal of Hubei University(Philosophy and Social Sciences),2005,32(3):338-341.
Authors:LIU Guo-min
Abstract:The Qongyang Commentary explained the meanings of the Spring and Autumn Annals by words, Word orders, writing or not writing and rules of writing which had two levels of meanings: obvious meaning and profound implication. The obvious meaning had indirect relations with the profound implication, so the profound imlication were obscure. The Qongyang Commentary on the Spring and Autumn Annals showed strong subjectivity. The main reasons were the distance between the obvious meaning and the rofound implication, the unity of opposites of the normal and the special rules of writing made the Qongyang Commentary expound its own subjective ideas freely.
Keywords:words  word orders  writing or not writing  rules of writing
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号