| 论法院裁判预决事实作为民事诉讼免证事实的非正当性 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王科琴.论法院裁判预决事实作为民事诉讼免证事实的非正当性[J].太原师范学院学报(社会科学版),2008,7(4):57-59. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王科琴 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京大学,法学院,江苏,南京,210093 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 法院裁判对后诉案件具有预决效力,进而使得当事人免于举证的理论基础——既判力,在我国尚未完全确立,且从既判力的角度审视,我国现行立法以及司法实践中的做法都存在诸多不当,故法院裁判预决的事实作为民事诉讼免证事实存在正当性方面的欠缺。
|
| 关 键 词： | 免证事实 既判力 预决事实 |
On the Unjustness of Pre-Definitely Facts in Decisions as Facts with Need not to be Proved in Civil Litigation |
| |
| WANG Ke-qin.On the Unjustness of Pre-Definitely Facts in Decisions as Facts with Need not to be Proved in Civil Litigation[J].Journal of Taiyuan Normal University:Social Science Edition,2008,7(4):57-59. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Ke-qin |
| |
| Abstract: | Res Judicata,which is the basic of pre-definitely facts in decisions as facts with need not to be proved in civil litigation,has not been established completely in our country.And surveying from the visual angle of res judicata,the active laws and the behaviors done during the judicial practice in our country are improper.So it is unwarrantable for pre-definitely facts in decisions to be facts with need not to be proved in civil litigation. |
| |
| Keywords: | facts with need not to be proved res judicata pre-definitely fact |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
