首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论我国诉讼证明标准的革新
引用本文:孙丹兵.论我国诉讼证明标准的革新[J].南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学 ),2003,40(4).
作者姓名:孙丹兵
作者单位:南京财经大学,人文社科部,南京,210003
摘    要:证明标准是证据法中的一个基本问题,对审判方式改革具有重要意义。西方主要国家一般都根据案件性质的不同设置了盖然性占优势、高度盖然性及排除合理怀疑等多元的证明标准。与西方国家相比,我国现行诉讼制度中的“客观真实”的证明标准属于确然性标准,存在着很大的内在缺陷。我国应借鉴两大法系国家的相关规定,对现行诉讼制度进行革新,建立盖然性证明标准。

关 键 词:证明标准  法律真实  盖然性标准

On the Renovation of the Lawsuit Testimony Standard in China
SUN Dan-bing.On the Renovation of the Lawsuit Testimony Standard in China[J].Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences),2003,40(4).
Authors:SUN Dan-bing
Abstract:The testimony standard is essential in evidence law, and is significant to the reform in the ways of judgment. Major western countries have laid down, according to the nature of lawsuits, a multi-factor testimony standard that covers probability advantage, high probability and elimination of reasonable suspicion. In contrast, the "objective verity" testimony standard in the Chinese lawsuit system falls under the certainty standard, innate with great defects. China should learn from the regulations of countries of the two major legal systems and carry out reforms in the current lawsuit system with a view to establishing a probability testimony standard.
Keywords:testimony standard  legal verity  probability standard
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号