首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

唯名论与唯实论之争:社会学内部的对立与动力--有关经典社会学发展的一项考察
引用本文:周晓虹.唯名论与唯实论之争:社会学内部的对立与动力--有关经典社会学发展的一项考察[J].南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学 ),2003,40(4).
作者姓名:周晓虹
作者单位:南京大学,社会学系,南京,210093
摘    要:在西方社会学160多年的发展中,一直存在着社会唯实论和社会唯名论两种对立倾向:前者认为,社会是由个体组成的,但是社会一旦形成,作为一个整体它具有先前的个体所不具备的突生性质;后者则认为,个体是最为重要的实体,而社会不过是一个虚幻的存在物,其基本的性质是由个体的性质所决定的。在经典社会学时代,这样一种对立的普遍存在,既造成了社会学家之间的巨大鸿沟,又成为推动社会学发展的内在动力。而这种对立和动力至今仍存在于宏观社会学和微观社会学的分歧之中。

关 键 词:社会唯名论  社会唯实论  经典社会学

Nominalism vs. Realism:Conflict and Drive Innate to Sociology
ZHOU Xiao-hong.Nominalism vs. Realism:Conflict and Drive Innate to Sociology[J].Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences),2003,40(4).
Authors:ZHOU Xiao-hong
Abstract:In the over 160 years of western sociology, two conflicting trends have existed; social nominalism and social realism. The former believes that a society is made up of individuals , but once it is formed, the society as a whole acquires sudden growth features unseen in individuals ; the latter believes that the individual is the most significant entity whereas the society is merely an illusory existence, whose nature is determined by that of the individual. In the era of classical sociology, the prevalent existence of such a conflict not only creates a huge gap a-mong sociologists but also becomes the drive for sociological development. This conflict and drive still exists in the differences between macro-sociology and micro-sociology.
Keywords:social nominalism  social realism  classical sociology  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号