| 行政垄断及其规制的再审视 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 史际春,赵忠龙.行政垄断及其规制的再审视[J].社会科学,2011(9). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 史际春 赵忠龙 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国人民大学法学院;兰州商学院法学院; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《反垄断法》的有效实施需要政府主导的监管措施,社会经济活动的专业化使得由专业行政监管机关行使管辖权是最直接和最有效的,恰如3Q大战中工业和信息化部的监管活动。欧盟与美国对行政限制的规制经验,需要结合我国的历史传统和公有制实践。行政主体与经济主体之间并无截然的界限和实质区别,政府和任何公共团体均可依法从事经济或民、商事活动,或者以其行政权力帮助、扶持、强制企业限制竞争,客观需要将政府自身的反竞争行为与其它主体的反竞争行为平等地适用于《反垄断法》,如此政府的角色定位方能合理暨合法。
|
| 关 键 词： | 行政垄断 反垄断法 竞争政策 |
Reviewing Administrative Monopoly and the Legal Form of Regulation |
| |
| Shi Jichun Zhao Zhonglong.Reviewing Administrative Monopoly and the Legal Form of Regulation[J].Journal of Social Sciences,2011(9). |
| |
| Authors: | Shi Jichun Zhao Zhonglong |
| |
| Institution: | Shi Jichun Zhao Zhonglong |
| |
| Abstract: | The efficient implementation of Anti-Monopoly Law of PRC(AML) needs social and economic regulation measures mainly supported by government.It is the most direct and effective regulation approach that specialized agencies apply regulating power of AML,which Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of PRC has taken in resolving the dispute between Tencent and 360.To better China's legal form of regulation should be based on her historical tradition and state-owned context and compare the experiences of... |
| |
| Keywords: | Administrative Monopoly Anti-Monopoly Law Competition Law and Policy |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
