| “革命史范式”和“本体论范式”的转换——中国新闻传播史研究路径的思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 宋三平.“革命史范式”和“本体论范式”的转换——中国新闻传播史研究路径的思考[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2008,39(6). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 宋三平 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华中科技大学新闻与信息传播学院,湖北武汉430074;南昌大学人文学院历史学系,江西南昌330031 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对新闻史研究范式尤其是对居主导地位的"革命史范式"的影响和评价的检讨,是近年来新闻史学界的一个热门话题."革命史范式"源于特殊时代,因此对它的批评应结合具体的历史场景来进行;新闻事业"本体"的纷繁复杂以及对"本体论"解读的莫衷一是,"本体论范式"也难于自圆其说.通过对两个范式的考量发现:构建一个范式来研究新闻史的做法,不符合新闻事业发生与发展的规律;研究的基本出发点应该是在还原历史场景的基础上,以探求历史事实之真和总结新闻史发展的历史规律为圭臬.
|
| 关 键 词： | 中国新闻传播史 研究路径 革命史范式 本体论范式 |
Ontology Paradigms Replaces Revolution History Paradigms |
| |
| SONG San-ping.Ontology Paradigms Replaces Revolution History Paradigms[J].Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2008,39(6). |
| |
| Authors: | SONG San-ping |
| |
| Institution: | SONG San-ping(School of Journalism , Communication,Huazhong University of Science , Technology,Wuhan 430074,China,Department of History,Nanchang University,Nanchang 330031,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | In recent years,study on the paradigms for press history has become a popular project in the academic circles of press history.The critic on the evaluation and impact of the revolution history paradigms was a particular heated topic.Revolution history paradigms formed in a special era,so its critic should be connected the specific historical scene and the ontology paradigms is also difficult to become a testified theory owing to the complicated journalism and the divergent interpretations of the journalisti... |
| |
| Keywords: | Chinese press and communication history research route revolution history paradigms ontology paradigms |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
