首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论20世纪20-40年代朱谦之的史学批评
引用本文:陈永霞.论20世纪20-40年代朱谦之的史学批评[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019,35(3):112-118.
作者姓名:陈永霞
作者单位:贵州大学 历史与民族文化学院, 贵阳 550025
摘    要:朱谦之是中国现代史学史上著名的史学家,其史学生涯中,大量运用了史学批评,他以史学批评的方式建构了自己的历史理论、史学理论与史学方法论。与同时代其他人的史学批评相比,朱谦之史学批评更多地关注了西方学人及其历史哲学。其史学评论是在宏大架构之下展开的,不同于传统批评方法,突出了对史学现象、史学观念及史学思想的评论,具有更为开阔的视野;史料与史观并重,是其史学批评的重要学术标准,在当时具有很强的现实针对性。 

关 键 词:史学批评    历史哲学    史观
收稿时间:2018-10-17

A Comment on the Zhu Qianzhi's Historical Criticism during the 1920s and the 1940s
Institution:College of History and Ethnic Culture, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
Abstract:Zhu Qianzhi was one of the famous historian in the 20th century in Chinese modern historiography.He applied a lot historical criticism in his historical research road.Including the use of historical criticism to construct his historical theory,historiography theory and historiography methodology,he was more interests in Western scholars and their historical philosophy.It was important for him to comment on historical phenomena,historical concept,and historical thought.With the deepening of his understanding,he gradually adjusted his view on historical materialism.The emphasis on historical material and historical view was an important academic standard for his historical criticism.His historical criticism was different from the methods of traditional criticism and Marxist historiography.We should pay more attention to his historical criticism. 
Keywords:
点击此处可从《北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号