首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

"攻击防御方法"之平衡--简论民事证据调查令制度
引用本文:宋平,严俊."攻击防御方法"之平衡--简论民事证据调查令制度[J].重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2005,22(5):100-105.
作者姓名:宋平  严俊
作者单位:1. 西南政法大学,重庆,400031
2. 四川理工学院,四川,自贡,643000
摘    要:在民事诉讼中,程序正义原则要求法院保障当事人诉讼地位平等,不仅应消极对待双方当事人,而且要积极辅助在"攻击防御方法"掌控上出于弱势的一方当事人.我国民事诉讼法对当事人和律师收集证据的手段和程序之规定既不利于当事人"攻击防御方法"的平衡,又有违法院中立地位的要求.我国应当在借鉴西方发达国家民事诉讼法中当事人取证制度的基础上建立并完善民事证据调查令制度.

关 键 词:民事诉讼  证据  调查令  攻击防御  平衡
文章编号:1672-0598(2005)05-0100-06
修稿时间:2005年5月27日

On the balance of "attacking and defending methods"--On civil affairs evidence investigation system
SONG Ping,YAN Jun.On the balance of "attacking and defending methods"--On civil affairs evidence investigation system[J].Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University Social Science Edition,2005,22(5):100-105.
Authors:SONG Ping  YAN Jun
Abstract:In civil proceedings,procedural justice principle requires court to protect the equal position of parties,not only to inactively treat both parties but also to help weak party by using "attacking and defending methods". The methods and procedures which China's civil proceeding law collects evidence from parties and lawyers are not only unhelpful to the balance of parties' attacking and defending methods but also violating position requirement of the courts.On the basis of learning procedure for taking evidence in civil proceeding law of developed countries,China should establish and consummate civil evidence investigation system.
Keywords:civil proceeding  evidence  investment order  attacking and defending method  balance
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号