Robust human development rankings |
| |
Authors: | Laurens Cherchye Erwin Ooghe Tom Van Puyenbroeck |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Center for Economic Studies, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Campus Kortrijk, E. Sabbelaan 53, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium;(2) Center for Economic Studies, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Naamsestraat 69, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;(3) European University College Brussels (Ehsal), Stormstraat 2, 1000 Brussels, Belgium |
| |
Abstract: | The United Nations’ Human Development Index (HDI) considers scores in three dimensions – income, school enrolment and literacy rate, longevity – and combines them into a single figure that measures the degree of development of a given country. However, there is disagreement about (1) how to weight the scores in the different dimensions and (2) how to aggregate the weighted scores over the different dimensions. At the risk of stressing the obvious, changes in weighting and/or aggregation will affect the country rankings. First, we focus on robust rankings, i.e., rankings which hold for a wide set of weighting and/or aggregation procedures. Second, we show that all proposed ranking procedures can be implemented via linear programming techniques. Third, we illustrate how our methodology can prove useful in assessing the robustness of the human development country ranking/classification (produced annually by the United Nations) in a descriptive and statistical way. An erratum to this article can be found at |
| |
Keywords: | Human development index Lorenz dominance Linear programming Robustness analysis |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|