首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

鲁迅、周作人的文学史论异同——《中国小说的历史的变迁》和《中国新文学的源流》比较
引用本文:刘恋.鲁迅、周作人的文学史论异同——《中国小说的历史的变迁》和《中国新文学的源流》比较[J].扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版),2014(3):87-92.
作者姓名:刘恋
作者单位:扬州大学广陵学院,江苏扬州225002
基金项目:江苏省社会科学基金项目(12ZWB011)
摘    要:鲁迅的《中国小说的历史的变迁》,以史涵论,蕴含着"人"(真人)的评史标准;周作人的《中国新文学的源流》,以论带史,返观"五四"新文化运动,明确了"志"(感情)的评史标准。这两篇讲稿,虽各有治学路数,但都着眼于新文学的"当下"文坛,从不同方向推进"人"的文学史观。

关 键 词:鲁迅  周作人  文学史  进化论  循环观  史与论

A Comparative Study of the Opinions of Lu Xun and Zhou Zuoren towards Literary History
LIU Lian.A Comparative Study of the Opinions of Lu Xun and Zhou Zuoren towards Literary History[J].Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition),2014(3):87-92.
Authors:LIU Lian
Institution:LIU Lian (School of Chinese Language and Literature, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225002, Jiangsu, China)
Abstract:Lu Xun's Vicissitudes of Chinese Novels contains his comments in literary history descrip- tion and embodies the standard of "human being" (real human being) in his commenting; Zhou Zuoren's Headstream of Chinese New Literature explicates his comments displaying at once the liter- ary history, reviews the "May Fourth New Culture Movement" and makes dear the standard of "Zhi" (sentiment) in commenting history. The two ectures, though in different academic approaches, both focus on the literary arena of the new literature and advance the humanistic concept of literay history from different directions.
Keywords:Lu Xun  Zhou Zuoren  literary history  theory of evolution  circulation view  history andcomment
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号